What have we got to lose?

Blake Aued's picture

House Speaker Glenn Richardson, like predecessor Tom Murphy, has a reputation for sending lawmakers who cross him to a legislative version of a Soviet gulag.

With two local representatives among a dozen or so mounting a palace coup, what does the Athens area have to lose?

Not much, really.

Rep. Terry England, R-Auburn, holds leadership posts on two minor committees, agriculture/consumer affairs and industrial relations, and sits on the powerful appropriations committee. Rep. Tommy Benton, R-Jefferson, is secretary of the education committee. Neither is risking much clout if their push to install Rep. David Ralston, R-Blue Ridge, as speaker fails.

The real power player around these parts is Rep. Bob Smith, R-Watkinsville. As vice chairman of appropriations for higher education, he’s the guy who brings home the bacon for UGA. He’s also on the powerful rules committee. Smith hasn’t said which side he’s coming down on, but my guess is he wants to stay on Richardson’s good side and keep his plum assignments.

Dreaming the impossible dream

Everyone who’s been clamoring for more coverage of Democrats, you can put a sock in it now.

Bobby Saxon and I had a nice heart-to-heart last week, and he’s almost got me convinced that he can pull off an upset in the 10th. Almost.

He has some numbers to back it up. Democrats Michael Thurmond and Thurbert Baker won 53 percent of the vote in the district in 2006. Democratic turnout topped Republican in the February presidential primary. Forty-one percent of district voters picked up a Democratic ballot in the July primary. Saxon received more votes in eight of 21 counties than either Paul Broun or Barry Fleming and more than both Republicans combined in five counties. And thousands of people are registering to vote, most of them Democrats. Obama’s coattails will be long in Georgia.

Allow me to put on my pundit hat for a second. Saxon sounds like a much more confident candidate than the greenhorn who jumped into the race in August armed with little more than some bad advice and unrealistic expectations. He’s a much better fit for the district than past candidates like Terry Holley or James Marlow, both politically and personality-wise.

As a reporter I don’t so much care who wins as I just want every race to go down to the wire so I have something to write about. Saxon won’t be as harsh as Barry Fleming – a wise move – but he’ll take it to Broun. State Senate candidate Tim Riley, likewise, is going to at least put up a fight against Ralph Hudgens.

Hudgens, by the way, about fell out laughing when I told him that Riley called him a tax-and-spend liberal.

“He’s going to have a tough time convincing the voters of that,” Hudgens said.

That’ll be a fun one to watch, even though Hudgens probably won’t even have to take a break from swimming Scrooge McDuck-style in his pool full of PAC money to swat away another pissant Democrat.

Speaking of PACs

Ever wish that four-figure checks would just mysteriously show up in your mailbox? Well, it happens to Hudgens all the time.

The chairman of the Senate insurance committee is sitting on more than $130,000 in campaign funds, but said he hasn’t asked for a dime in years.

“I have never asked a soul for a penny” since 2003, he said. “It’s just money that comes in.”

Must be nice.

Blake.aued@onlineathens.com

Tags
Comments

A retired seargent

who served under Bobby Saxon was introduced to me at an election night victory party (I was not at Paul Brouns). He said there were 300 men who served under Saxon and they were organized and ready to be involved in the campaign in a big way.

As for the counties where Saxon got more votes than Broun. Franklin County is an example which proves the stated hypothesis null. There was a 3 way race for sheriff, all on the democrat side and no sheriff candidates on the republican. What ballot did a majority of the citizens choose? Democrat so they could vote for sheriff.

Broun will mop the floor with Saxon.

dems vs US

I think Saxon is done, stick a fork in it, Jackson too. It looks like the only shot for a dem pick up is the Riley guy. He is the only one who looks to have a shot. I have to say if I had not been in Madison county and heard the guy speak I would have not thought he had a chance either, but if he gets his word out he will win. Our own party is starting to realize what Ralph really is and it looks like Riley may be able to beat him. I am even tired of the lies from Ralph!

I was one of the few that

I was one of the few that thought the Broun campaign's internal polls would hold up on election day. Thankfully, I was right. But Blake, your blog today gives me a funny feeling that can only partially be attributed to gas from my breakfast of curry tofu.
Will Saxon win? No way. But here's guessing Paul's margin of victory this November will be less than the 40 percent by which he beat Barry Fleming.

-30-

I would hope so

If Saxon can't beat 29 percent the Dems ought to go ahead and pack it in.

I'm not saying he's going to win, but he has the potential to make it interesting. Same goes for Riley.

Jackson has a different row to hoe. The district is a little less red but it's not like you can go out there and start slinging mud at nice-guy Bill Cowsert.

Baby Mama Drama

After Richardson's "Many Faces of Eve" Baby-Mama-Drama last session, it would be great to get a new face not connected to his body at the gavel. However, Ralston (though a nice guy to talk with, and a fair lawyer on the other side) has some wicked serious problems with understanding his obligations to pay his taxes like the rest of us are required by law to pay. I can't believe there's no better person out of the many politicians in that chamber to pick from, even though Athens' representatives have never been anywhere or done anything even tangentially related to their elected offices that I'm remotely aware of. Strike that, that one guy did go to the "Sixth Co-convener" meeting recently. Anyway, how anyone could even consider casting a vote for Ralph Hudgens when he is so filthily covered in insurance PAC money, and so obviously their boy, is far beyond my ken. People never fail to amaze me. I'm sure Cowsert's over there in Atlanta doing something for us, I just don't know what. It wouldn't hurt our politicians to actually attend local events with something approaching regularity so we could know what they're doing. Hey, they could even take part. I do it, and I'm on the school board for heaven's sake.

We might finally get to see

We might finally get to see G-Rich's divorce records. I can't wait.

Who the @%#$ sealed that file?

I'd like to know the basis on which that file was sealed; I highly doubt that file has any proper legal basis to be sealed and though I am myself speaking without any basis of knowledge, if it is found that there was no proper reason for sealing it, that judge should be disbarred. Lawyers get disbarred every month in GA for failing to return phone calls.

Judges are supposed to be held to an even higher ethical standard. This is absolutely ludicrous, and I am sick of the Good Ole Boy network here in this state. I am constantly astounded by how in the very same judicial circuits you sometimes see jurists who are so above reproach that they would end their own career rather than commit a minor ethical violation, practicing right next to jurists who think they are above the law and will bend it to meet their preconceived notions of what and who is "right" or "good" (or just do anything to protect their buddy).

More Baby Mama Drama

I had a moment to check-- as I said, I should know all this stuff but I've had no time for months to even stay reasonably current on what's happening in the world around me. Apparently his file was sealed AND his divorce granted by his former law partner, Judge James Osborne, even though other judges in that judicial circuit recused themselves according to a July 22 ABH story. Did those other judges have closer relationships to Speaker Richardson than being his former law partner? The only thing closer than that I can think of would be the utility lobbyist he was alleged to have... well, I won't even finish that thought. That would be almost as unethical as Judge Osborne conducted himself in my opinion. How is the State Bar not all over this? "Ordinary citizens" seeking a divorce have to splatter their intimate details in the public record for everyone in the world to see and know about and there's not a thing they can do about it. Too bad they can't all be House Speaker and have their former law partner seal their files and grant their divorces for them. We should all be so lucky-- well, except for Richardson's former wife. How did her lawyer let this happen? Was he asleep?

Stop the presses -- news flash

John:

You've really got to get out, read the paper more.

That's all old news and supposedly a complaint has been filed with the JQC. If you're that outraged, maybe you should file one too.

When have you ever seen the State Bar get all over anything, other than verdict caps, and contingent fee contracts?

You're partially right

Steve:

As I said, I haven't been able to keep up for some months now-- yes, this is old news; yes, I knew a complaint had been filed about the dalliance. However, I haven't caught up enough to know whether a complaint had been filed about the real ethical violation-- the involvement of a former law partner as a sitting judge in a case with a litigant. As far as the State Bar getting "all over anything"-- all you have to do is open ANY Georgia Bar Journal, available to anyone, and read the Discipline section to see that every single month, lawyers are disbarred for failing to return clients' phone calls, failing to promptly return clients' files, failing to pursue a matter as rapidly as the Bar deemed sufficient, etc. I may not be as informed as I'd like to be about our infamous Speaker, but I am very informed about those things that can get a lawyer disbarred.

Mark Burkhalter for

Mark Burkhalter for speaker!!!

or Bob Smith, everyone loves him (aside from the board of regents).